Taxicab Classification Essay - 876 Words

Our analysis is based on a sample size of fifteen jurisdictions. These cities were chosen on the basis of geographic diversity and relevance: three major cities from the Northeast, three cities from the Midwest, three cities from the South, and six cities from the West. Overall, these jurisdictions exhibit a broad range of approaches to entry management and a variety of regulatory systems. Most of these cities do not institute taxicab caps; in the sample, only six out of fifteen cities have caps. Analysis of Accepted Practices Findings – Types of Caps Standards for Setting and Modifying Caps Each sampled jurisdiction has its own process of determining the number of taxi permits in a closed market. In most cases, the number of†¦show more content†¦To address these proposed actions, state agencies prepare an environmental impact statement that outlines all potential environmental consequences of the proposed actions, potential alternatives, unavoidable environmental effects, and the steps to be taken by state agencies to mitigate the consequences. In order for additional taxi permits to be issued in a city, the impacts on socioeconomic conditions, transportation, public health, neighborhood character, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions would be assessed comprehensively. Transportation-related variables including impact on traffic, parking, pedestrians or bicycles, and transit facilities would be examined as well. Example: New York City. 3. Public Convenience Necessity (â€Å"PCN†) In order to operate a taxicab in certain jurisdictions, a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (â€Å"CPCN†) is required. To apply for the certificate, a new entrant must first prove that he/she is qualified by demonstrating his/her ability to provide a continuous taxicab service, lack of criminal record, etc. Once qualified, the applicant must attend a Public Convenience and Necessity (â€Å"PCN†) hearing to make a case that there is a need for additional service. The burden of proof falls on the applicant. During the hearing, stakeholders such as existing service providers are allowed to intervene, and this may create a significant obstacle for the applicant. Examples: Chicago, Las Vegas and New Orleans. 4.Show MoreRelatedFeminine Mystique12173 Words   |  49 PagesSupplemental Reading for US History 2 From Rosie to Lucy Questions students must answer in a 500-word (minimum) essay: 1) Describe the post-WWII frustrations felt by women such as Betty Friedan. 2) During the era of â€Å"Rosie the Riveter†, what gains did women make in the workforce? How did these women feel about themselves and their contributions? What did society as a whole think? 3) What role did mass media play during the 1950s and 1960s in regard to supporting or undermining theRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 PagesMultitasking Step 2: Establishing Project Priorities 106 Step 3: Creating the Work Breakdown Structure 108 Major Groupings Found in a WBS 108 How WBS Helps the Project Manager 109 WBS Development 109 34 A Portfolio Management System Classification of the Project Financial Criteria 37 Nonfinancial Criteria 39 36 36 Applying a Selection Model 42 Sources and Solicitation of Project Proposals 43 Ranking Proposals and Selection of Projects 44 Step 4: Integrating the WBS with the OrganizationRead MoreStrategy Safari by Mintzberg71628 Words   |  287 Pagesaccessories or guidance systems, why could they not have defined their business as flagellation? (quoted in Normann, 1977:34). Why should a few clever words on a piece of paper enable a railroad company to fly airplanes, or for that matter, run taxicabs? Levitt wrote that once it genuinely thinks of its business as taking care of people s transportation needs, nothing can stop it from creating its own extravagantly profitable growth (1960:53, italics added). Nothing except the limitations ofRead MoreProject Managment Case Studies214937 Words   |  860 Pageshazards should prevent the launch of the first shuttle as long as the aggregate risk remained acceptable. NASA used a rather simplistic Safety (Risk) Classification System. A quantitative method for risk assessment was not in place at NASA because gathering 9 ~ page 50. ~ ~ , 416 THE SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER DISASTER Exhibit l: Risk classification system l Lewl Criticality Criticality Criticality Criticality Description 1 (Cl) 2 (C2) 3 (C3) 1R (ClR) Loss of life and/or vehicle if the