Sunday, March 17, 2019
English Only Laws Essay -- Essays Papers
incline Only LawsTo start with, we may non live in England, nevertheless the language we speak is supposed to be English. So, one would think that a person would have no conundrum speaking this language at the fetchplace unless the job calls for a antithetic language, This is not so. Countless people have challenged this policy of several variant companies and this is what I will be discussing, in English. First, most of the starters speak English, maybe not as a primary language, but speak it to the trump out of their ability. This policy, to speak only English at the workplace, was completely and totally lawful since all the employees spoke English. Now, the employer did not say they could not speak Spanish during their break times. Only that while they were working, they were to speak English. This problem happens a circuit in the Army because Hispanics make up a considerable digress of our Army. This problem should not come up though, because it is the United States Army. The US speaks English as its primary language. In the Army however, we can make a correction because if it is not directly related to the job, it should not be happening. It unflustered does however, because it has become commonplace. Second, many employees speak Spanish and English, so these employees are bilingual.They could be saying one thing in English and switch to Spanish in the middle of a sentence. This can get very aggravating, for example, ii employees are giving a demonstration to an important client, who only speaks English. The dickens employees get confused about something in the demonstration and automatically hark back to the language they are most comfortable with, Spanish. The client meanwhile is getting very frustrated. While the two employees speak Spa... ...d give the briefing for that twenty-four hours and then turn around and start talking about the work crew. I seriously doubt the work crew would like that. The work crew would pro bably try to sue the employer under Title seven somehow.In closing , the business ultimately belongs to the owner, and he can agree almost any policy he wants, within reason. He employee should be thankful for the job. The employer should put this policy in writing in the drill process. All of this just goes to show what some people will do to make people for something that the other person thinks they did wrong to them. All in all, I think the justice system works to the best of its capability, but there are always going to be those individuals that try to build advantage of the system. In the end, all a person can do is try to raise their children so they learn the right way to apportion people.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment