Relationships in a World without God Essay -- Philosophy Philosophical

Relationships in a World without GodIn a public in which lives argon shaped by irreversible choices and by random events, a world in which everything occurs only when once, existence seems to lose its substance. Life in this designless world raises questions of identity and can cause turmoil between the relationships of the egotism to early(a)s, the self to history, and the self to God. Through the words of existentialist novelists and philosophers Milan Kundera and Jean-Paul Sartre, we witness the philosophical and mental struggles for identity, existence, and cosmos of the characters in The Unbearable Lightness of Being, and Nausea. In connection with other philosophic writings of Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Tillich and Sartre the ideas of existentialism expressed in these two novels change by reversal more apparent, and the relationships of the characters in this world-without-God can be explored. Our principle readings rested in the argument of mans existence and being . Sartres Nausea and Kunderas Unbearable Lightness of Being both depicted the stories of humans seek to digest their own realities in a state of what Heidegger referred to as thrown-ness. Heideggers existential thoughts are concerned with the question of the meaning of Being. Heidegger based his ism upon the science of existence. The scientific method was that of phenomenological reduction. Although Sren Kierkegaard accepted the paradox of being defining itself, as a scientist, Heidegger could not accept this paradox. According to Heidegger, a concept must be defined without using itself as reference. The bother of definition was confronted by defining Being as a appealingness of concepts. In his essay The Fundamental Question of Metaphysics... ...r own histories, their struggles with purpose and meaning, and the drink of their thrownness create a compelling and emotionally engaging novel that check the insecurities and consciousness of our own lives. Heidegger states that t ime only reminds men of how insignificant they are, how undated the universe is, and how all they can really do is seek to accept themselves on their own terms in anticipation of death, to wonder at the meaning of it all. Kierkegaard and Miller address the loathing of the impasse that threatens their lives as a result of historicism (and the absence of God). And Nietzsche claims that we must use history to escape animal-ness, but not so far as to become further confine within our consciousness. Throughout history, and in each mans life, in that respect is return to the center, to the same errors, and to that danger and fear of nothingness.