Love’s Pain Is Its Own Redemption Essay

What is passion? According to Joseph Rey F. Celestino, M.A, this is a enquiry that excites and stirs a thousand fold of former(a) gestures in our minds. Thats a verbatim of what he had say in an article he do, c eithitherd delights Pain is Its profess Redemption. It is an article that overt my eyes to the reality of make out. Its an article that never seizes to amaze me, to amuse me, to make me headland my beliefs, and change my views and opinions (in a ripe focal point), no proposition how many epochs I read it. It continues to take care as an instrument of wonder, ch solelyenging me to go out, explore, and take care the magic, the marvel, and the astounding beaut of chip in a go at it.Its an article slightly the enticing world both(prenominal)thing that we every(prenominal) deal of, exactly sole(prenominal) commence a glimpse of its authoritative form. I have never viewed recognise in a way thats pull down just a tiny bit nasty to the way I see it now. I gained a deeper understanding of how making bop moves and works, but I know that I still have a broad way to go before I figure out what cacoethes re tot altogetheryy is, or who knows? Maybe Ill never find the right field words to set what it is. Maybe Ill never know what chouse means. The possibilities are stamp outless. barely this article is my guide, so that I wont get lost, as I start my quest on conclusion clues that might lead me to the attends Ive been looking for, to questions I never ruling I would ever ask, about things I never apprehension Id be curious about.According to the author, What is love? is a question that knows no barriers, knows no bounds, and knows no age and generation. He also made a statement which I find very agreeable. He said that love is the roughly celebrated theme of benignant existence () I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. No matter who you are, where youre from, how old you are, or what gender you are, you absolutely, pos itively have something to say about something is related to love, or when love it self is being talked about. We all(prenominal) have our own views and opinions regarding love. These may be brought about by mere experiences, or our beliefs, or other particularors that may affect or form our nouss and judgments.He further stated that the untangle web of mystery of love is what binds us all. He said that As we are drawn to the nearness of its answer, the more(prenominal) that we find ourselves confused and puzzled. Pertaining to the question being discussed. He explained how love or the question of what it is, is in fact withal close to being a paradoxical phenomena. Maybe thats why people return so hard to find a definition for love. Maybe thats why people try to enthr iodine love in words. Because people do not want things and questions go away unanswered and undefined.Being curious is in our nature. We hunger and thirst for answers to things we do not even fully underst and. We find it hard to let things be. Because we exist questioningly. And we do not easily let things go. Thats why, all(prenominal) of us, whether we say it or not, has our own definition of love. We on our own try to define it, or share our ideas about it to find common things with others ideas, and throw a concrete explanation or definition of love. For what reasons, there may be a lot. precisely the point is, the mere presence of love in a conversation, or discussion, or anything, really, we automatically get elicit and pay attention, because we want to know what it is.The author, through the article, further explained thing about love that might deepen, or cut our curiosity about it. He explained that the on- passage controversy about the definition of love is not new to the world. He said that that controversy went even way, way back before some of us existed. He said that Philosophy has been toilsome to go through braggy questions, much(prenominal) as Is love and una nswerable question, or an unquestionable answer?, and Why is there love, rather than no love at all?. As I said earlier, according to the author, Philosophy has been trying to reckon these questions for more than two and a half millennia of its existence. This means that Philosophy has been trying to approach these problems for over 2,000 years.He further stated that Socrates and Plato, on the one hand, and the poetic movement led by Homer, on the other hand, opened their regard asive conversation tables on the subjects of love and intimacy in that antiquated far away. He also said that scholars of the present day, still lurk on the ideas leftfield by these past masters. Countless books have already been published, (and still publishing), of millions of films have already been produced, just to give us an advance of hope or a glimpse of the definition, or the answers to the questions about love. Its taking so long, for people to find loves meaning. And yet, we never get tired.Wi th each(prenominal) experience we gain, we get bits and pieces of ideas of how we can define love. however still, despite all efforts given by our ancestors, and us, people in the present, we only see a blur, of loves true form. Maybe its about eon we stop trying to define love, and just let it be. Let love be love. Maybe, we should start experiencing it, and enjoying it, instead of stressing ourselves trying to find meaning to something this mysterious, this orotund, this amazing. Yes, perchance we should do that. But theres something about trying to define love, that gives us this finger of satisfaction, because that more we try to find meaning for it, the more we get to experience it. Our hearts burst with so much gladness when we know that we are in the presence of love.Mr. Celestino, got into a deeper explanation of gobs more interesting topics, like, the myths created by society, about love, about Aristophanes narrative that concerns human relationship, and a lot more, Part of this a lot more topics include on of my favorite arguments ever. adore at kickoff kettle of fish. I have never been a believer of love at first sight. This may sound offensive to those who believe, but, I think the idea is pretty unrealistic. Yes, its a really good idea. I mean, wouldnt it be decorous to see someone and automatically know that that person is the one? Isnt that what happens in most romantic movies? Two people just happens to be in the same place,, at the same time, and look at each other at the same moment. They look into each others eyes, and poof Theyre in love. It would be nice. I really would. But as I said earlier, thats what happens in most movies. Thats what happens in most romantic books or novels, even.These are made to vibrate our systems and trick us into believing that these things could actually happen in to us real life. Truthfully speaking, nothing that perfectly constructed, and well-made could happen in real life. We exist in reality. W e dont live in some 2-hour-or-so film that is so beautifully made, it may be close to perfection. Thats not how life works. Thats not reality is all about. On the contrary, in reality, nothing happens the way we imagine it would, let but like what would happen in films or books. Thats exactly why people make films and movies. They make things that they imagine come to life. They make their imaginations front real, by limitting them into films or books. This is where people get the concept of love at first sight. And upon reading through the article, I just comprise more proof to what I believe in. Mr Celestino said that there is no such thing as love at first sight. In verbatim, he said Love does not bite on a first sight.He explained that The presence of the other that is brought to ones sight appears as an assembly of physical qualities and in turn, the one beholding such sight finds himself or herself being caught in a feeling that is patently stated as draw. This statement sums up my thoughts, and puts them into words. As I most commonly say it, Love takes time. Baka infatuation lang yan. He further explained that the attraction brought about or formed by meeting or visual perception someone particularly attractive, may breathe two things. Infatuation and affection.He said that infatuation is a shadow of loves true form. He said that infatuation is confined as mere appetite of corporeal qualities that are usually pleasing aesthetically to ones sight for a short-lived time. Affection, on the other hand is love in its potential state. Affection is something that may grow to be love. Love is neither infatuation, nor is it affection. Although affection may grow to be love, it is not love. At least, not yet. These two are commonly mistaken to be love. But as I always say, love takes time. It doesnt happen in a blink of an eye.He explained other topics, like the famous clichs, Love is blind, First love never dies, what love is in the Philippines, and anoth er(prenominal) one of my favorite topics, rejection. According to the article, Rejection is annoyingful but it is liberating in the sense that the self that is being refused is set free to reclaim himself/herself in aver to heal the wounded soul and to love again when the right time comes. Yes, love is liberating, it may take some time to make all the pain go away, because nothing hurts more than the refusal of one to receive the self that is being offered. It traps the soul of the buffer into a world of agony and pain, and sometimes, the lover finds no other meaning in life, since he and his love had been rejected. This is why rejection is crucial in a lovers life. Simply because the pain inflicted to that person, may cost him his very life.The author also explained what pain is, and what its all about, selfishness, and divorce and separation, how Gods love for humanity, and Christs crucifixion is the concretion of love in an ultimate sense. And he cease this beautiful article with a just conclusion, he said, To love, therefore, is to face even what is uncalled for and to manifest unselfish goodwill towards the other. It could be painful in the march but love will find a way to flog it. That is why there is resurrection in every instance of death. I was left with no words, as I reached the last page of the article. It was beautiful, breathtaking, and heart stopping. It verbalize from a view that is totally different from others. And it may still not contain answers to my question, but it made me hunger for more, thirst for answers, and crave for the experience of love in its fullest.For me, to earn a symbiotic and integral relationship, there are a lot of values needed. Love, as there core, with others such as consider, understanding, disciple, respect, etc. In spite of all these, I think a symbiotic relationships would not exist without respect. Because, well, love and respect would not be right without one another. If you love someone, you are goin g to respect him/her. And the everything else will follow. Respect comes with trust, and understanding. If you respect a person, you will trust him, that he/shes doing things for the better. You would come to a deeper understanding because you respect each other, and each others opinions. You will be discipline, because you respect your love one, and if you respect them, you wont do anything that would bring them harm. all(prenominal), in all, I think respect is an essential in a mutual good-natured relationship.After reading the article, honestly, I was left with no words. I was too breathless, too astonished, too bewildered to even speak. I had to process my thoughts, and get the thoughts of the author in synced with my own. I had to clear my head and catch my breath. Im not saying that the article gave me too much to handle. All Im trying to say is that the article is something different from all others that I have read. And now that its been a while since I last read the artic le, I can finally confide with my thoughts and put them into words. After reading this article, I have learned so much, and I can easily say that I have more experience about love than I could ever imagine. I never thought Id see myself writing this essay about love, (which isnt really my specialty), yet here I am, close to my fourth page.I never knew I had so much to say about love until now. I never knew the impact and effect that article had on me. And all my thoughts, put into a statement after reading Loves Pain is Its Own Redemption is found in the very first sentence of this entire essay. It seems to me like I just went back to where I started, and let me state (or ask) it again. What is love? I learned that no matter how hard we try to define love, its just too big of a paradox to start with. Its too broad of an idea to put in just a few words in the dictionary. Its too extraordinary to try and figure out. Its to magical, to be given any scientific explanation. So I want to end my essay the way I started it. After reading the article scripted by Joseph Rey Celestino, M.A., Im left with only one question (and a gazillion more underneath it). What is love?