Lee Harvey Oswald Was Not the Lone Assassin

On November 22nd, 1963, chair John F. Kennedy (JFK) was mutable and killed in a motorcade running through Dealy Plaza, in Dallas, Texas. in brief afterwardwardward, a gay by the nonice of lee Harvey Oswald was arrested and charged with the kill of chairwoman Kennedy. Over the years at that place has been such(prenominal)(prenominal) controversy over if Lee Harvey Oswald was in detail, the whizz man pertain in the character assassination of JFK. The assassination is still a topic of debate to this twenty-four hour period and has spawned some crew theories.At the clock, thither was atomic persuasive read to prove that Oswald was confused in whatsoever sort of conclave to assassinate the chairwoman, but as time went on lot began to grow queer of authentic functions. In 1966, Mark street was aneness of the first to introduce the head that Oswald did not act solely with the issuance of his book Rush to Judgment. straight off today, 75% of muckle bel ieve Lee Harvey Oswald did not act a solitary1, 70% of respondents believed that the assassination involved more than ane person2. Also 66% of Americans believe that in that respect was a conspiracy, period 74% believed that in that location was a pay up3.It is inevitable that on that point is much disorderliness as to who was involved in the assassination of death chair Kennedy, but I securely believe that there is indisputable conclusion that fates that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone in the assassination. To start off, after the assassination took place and Oswald was captured, authorities changed the identity of the murder sleeve many clock. For instance, alternate Sheriff Eugene Boone and Deputy Constable Seymour Weitzman both initially set the murder utensil as a 6. 5 mm Carcano give-up the ghost, but the contiguous day Weitzman signed affidavit describing the artillery as a 7. 5mm Mauser hyphen action drop dead, equipped with a 4/18 scope. Later on, investigators identified the rifle as a 6. 5mm Carcano, proving that Weitzman lied slightly the murder weapon. In his book, Mark r forbiddene exploits this as the strongest reason why there was a cover up.He says The strongest component fracture in the case against Lee Harvey Oswald was the warren fits conclusion that his rifle had been found on the 6th floor of the hold up repository building. Yet Oswald never owned a 7. 65 Mauser. When the FBI later continueed that Oswald had purchased scarcely a 6. 5 Italian Mannlicher-Carcano, the weapon t police headquarters in Dallas miraculously changed its size, its repair and its nationality. The Warren Commission concluded that a 6. 5 Mannlicher-Carcano, not a 7. 65 German Mauser, had been discover by the Dallas deputies. Also many witnesses to the assassination were aggressively confronted and were told to keep tranquil close to what they saw. Acquilla Clemmons, who claimed she saw both men, not solitary(prenominal) Oswa ld, at the scene of Officer J. D. Tippets4 murder, says a man armed with a accelerator confronted her at her house and told her not to speak of what she saw.Leading off of this, in the next three years following the assassination, 18 witnesses were mysteriously killed along with many tribe dealing with the investigation process. This is significant because it shows that it was not just a coincidence that prohibited of the small number of people that were testifying as witnesses already, many were being killed off. Somebody precious these witnesses quiet. These deaths seemed to follow a pattern. Whenever various governing agencies started a new investigation to calculate further into the assassination, key people at bottom the agency would be killed, and the investigations halted.Key people were dispatch when the New Orleans regularise Attorney, Senate In placeigence direction, and House Select Committee on Assassinations started to conduct efficient investigations. other claim by the Warren missionary work is that a single green goddess killed the hot seat and wounded the governor. in that location argon many flaws with this theory, most prominent being that if there was in fact only one hummer tantrum, it must obligate travelled through 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, some 15 inches of tissue, struck a tie-in knot, removed 4 inches of rib, and shattered a radius bone.Apart from this being rattling un promising, the Zapruder film5 shows president Kennedy being wounded in between frames 225 and 226, while governor Connelly appears to switch been wounded in frame 240. professional person conspiracy theorists believe that this is indisputable evidence that there were two shooters, because it is impractical to approach two shots from a Carcano rifle in less(prenominal) than 2. 3 seconds (43 frames in the film), slowdown for anti conspiracy theorists it proves the single bullet theory correct. The evidence tips in respect of the pro conspiracy theorists because this shot is irtually unrealizable to successfully make. With the angle the bullet entered and the fact that there was so much to go through and the bullet came out in near perfect condition, with some bow down in the back end of the bullet, it is more likely that there were in fact two shots fired. Judging by the fact that it is impossible to fire two shots from a Carcano rifle in less than 2. 3 seconds, and the president and the governor were hit within 15 frames of each other on the Zapruder film, it only makes sense that there were two purloin gunmen.Another reason why Lee Harvey Oswald was not the lone assassin is that he himself was assassinated two days after capture. While Oswald was being transported to the county jail, he was shot point blank on hold water television by a man named Jack ruby. Ruby claimed to authorities to set about murdered him to avenge the death of chairperson Kennedy. He wanted to avenge Kennedy for nationalis m and out of pity for the widow. Ruby owned a nightclub in Dallas at the time, and was also a known mobster and women and drug trafficker.Although Ruby claims to slang murdered Oswald as r even soge for killing chairwoman Kennedy, most people believe it was part of a cover up for a much larger conspiracy. After Rubys arrest, he was sentenced to death, only to consider his trials postponed and die of lung cancer shortly after postponing the trial. While Oswald was in interrogative, he changed his boloney many times when asked routine questions such as where were you at the time of the shooting, or explain to us what you did the day of the assassination. He also denied any involvement in the incident even though there was evidence against him.Oswald was enclose to face further, more intense interrogation in the future, and this is the reason most people believe that assassination of Oswald was to prevent him from talking about what actually happened in the Kennedy assassination. There were also many st incline reports of president Kennedys mental capacityiac being switched from when it was seen in evidence, to when the examine was performed. There were pictures of Kennedys brain for evidence showing immense cost to the rear, consistent with an exit wound and wherefore evidence of a shot from the front.Meanwhile, the autopsy brain did not nearly show the same join of damage in the back of the brain, and an exit wound in the front. Douglas Horne, the Record Review Boards chief psychoanalyst for military records tell that he was 90-95% certain that these brains were not the same. The idea of a brain switch is highly likely match to many investigators on the subject. This is evidence of a cover up because the way the bullet entered the brain could have shown numerous things to investigators.For one thing, it could have shown the angle and direction in which the bullet entered, proving that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have shot Kennedy from the 6th sto ry of the Texas Book Depository because of the difference in the angles. It could have also shown multiple bullet wounds, disproving the single bullet theory, and ruling out Oswald as the lone assassin. In all, having investigators obtain Kennedys real brain would have been catastrophic to any conspiracy, for it would have proved that the conspiracys scapegoat Lee Harvey Oswald was not the lone assassin.The situation in which Oswald had supposedly shot Kennedy continues to seem less and less likely to be possible. Both Craig Roberts6 and Carlos Hathcock7 said that this assassination could not have been through how the Warren Commission says it was. Let me tell you what we did at Quantico, we reconstructed the whole thing the angle, the range, the moving target, the time limit, the obstacles, everything. I tiret know how many times we tried it, but we couldnt recapitulate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did.Now if I cant do it, how in the world could a computed axial tomog raphy who was a non-qual on the rifle range and later only qualified crack shot do it? 8 This quote vividly disproves the idea that Oswald was the lone gunman. Two highly qualified snipers all recreated the scene of the assassination, and could not make the shot in a copious amount of attempts, but a mere marksman Oswald could make the shots perfectly in one? These odds are extremely unlikely, and to recall that it is even possible that Oswald could make a shot of this caliber is absurd.There are countless reasons why Lee Harvey Oswald was not the lone gunman in the Kennedy assassination. The final verdict on the assassination of President Kennedy, is that Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots from a 6. 5 mm Carcano rifle out of the 6th floor window in the Texas Depository building, with one bullet abstracted the motorcade entirely, one bullet going through Kennedys back, and one bullet puncturing the back of Kennedys head, straight through to Governor Connelly, wounding him sever ely.An abundance of witness accounts intelligibly state that they heard shots elsewhere, and were told to be quiet about this, the shot Oswald would have had to make was impossible, Oswald was murdered two days after his arrest, the Zapruder film disproves the idea of the lone gunman, and there were many falsifications in the stories of Oswald and investigators about what happened that day, what weapon was used in the murder, the brain description, and what happened in interrogation. The lack of paperwork itself should have been enough to escape from the opinions of a higher authority that there was something wrong with the investigation.Even when researching this topic, it is still not even clear what did happen on that horrible day. The Warren Commission, along with the Dallas Police, the FBI, and many other organizations, did an atrocious job of decent investigating and documenting the investigation of this assassination. If that is not sufficient, there is the fact that the w ay the final report claims this assassination happened is not humanly possible. This has been prove by highly trained snipers and headspring informed authority. Lee Harvey Oswald was not a sniping guru, nor was he the man who by himself killed President John F. Kennedy.